Before they started trading as "Cancer Research UK",
the Imperial Cancer Research Fund and the Cancer Research Campaign had around
170 years of fundraising between them .
When they started, cancer was a rare disease : now it is an
out-of-control epidemic : 40% - and rising - of the UK population have, or will
develop cancer : we face a theoretical 100% incidence within decades.
CRUK are collecting over £400,000,000 - and
rising - per year.
None of which will be spent on research into the
safe, effective treatments which have existed for decades. Dr Otto Warburg’s
1932 Nobel Prize was awarded for work on the basic nature of cancer : work
which has been ignored by the fraudulent “researchers.”
"A SOLUTION TO CANCER WOULD MEAN THE TERMINATION OF RESEARCH
PROGRAMMES, THE OBSOLESCENCE OF SKILLS, THE END OF DREAMS OF PERSONAL GLORY.
TRIUMPH OVER CANCER WOULD DRY UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO SELF-PERPETUATING
CHARITIES...IT WOULD MORTALLY THREATEN THE PRESENT CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENT BY
RENDERING OBSOLETE THE EXPENSIVE SURGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC
TREATMENTS IN WHICH SO MUCH MONEY, TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT IS INVESTED... THE
NEW THERAPY MUST BE DISBELIEVED, DENIED, DISCOURAGED AND DISALLOWED AT ALL
COSTS, REGARDLESS OF ACTUAL TESTING RESULTS AND, PREFERABLY, WITHOUT ANY
TESTING AT ALL." The
Houston/Null Analysis.
The CRUK components, the ICRF and the CRC, were instrumental in the
sabotage, using false data, of the Bristol Cancer Help Centre : the Centre was
becoming a threat to CRUK donations as increasing numbers of the public heard
of its success rates.
The Naturopathic Cancer Therapy Trust, which is successfully treating
“terminal” patients who have been left to die after being subject to CRUK-produced
treatments, has been the subject of two attacks.
The first through the licence-funded BBC’s Watchdog programme and the second through the
Charity Commission : both attacks failed.
To protect the industries which are responsible for
the cancer epidemic and ensure that the
disease continues to increase, with ever more millions pouring into the
"research" coffers, The Imperial Cancer Research Fund issued a statement - "One
of the biggest myths in recent years is that there is a cancer epidemic caused
by exposure to radiation, pollution, pesticides and food additives." The fact that no genuine
cancer research organisation would go out of its way to protect the industries
mainly responsible for the cancer epidemic is completely lost on the
CRUK-tee-shirted celebrity and media supporters, the "Cycle/Race for
Life" disciples and the other
simpletons running marathons or shaking tubs in the street.
Through various means ; from gross deception - “ I’m all
clear ”, “ I shouldn’t be here.”, etc. to total fabrications - “
75% of women with breast cancer are now being successfully treated ”, the cancer syndicate have managed to convince
the masses that their treatments are “curing cancer”.
NO cancer victim has ever been restored through
surgery, drugs or radiation. There is NO correlation between shrinking or
removing a tumour by these means and restoring health to a patient.
Only naturopathic therapies are capable of restoring
health.
In 1975, the leading US cancer statistician, Prof H B Jones of the Dept.
of Physics and Physiology, Univ. CA., Berkeley, announced - "It
is utter nonsense to claim that catching cancer symptoms early enough will
increase the patient's chances of survival. Not one scientist or study has
proven that in any way. My studies have proved conclusively that untreated
cancer victims live up to four times longer than treated individuals. If one
has cancer and opts to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better
than if he undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery ; other than when used
in immediate life-threatening situation. ... it is not the cancer that kills
the victim. It’s the breakdown of the defence mechanism ... With every cancer
patient who keeps in excellent physical shape .. to build up his natural
resistance, theres a high chance that the body will find its own defence
against the cancer. He may have many good years left in good health. He
shouldn’t squander them by being made into a hopeless invalid through radical
medical intervention which has zero chance of extending his life.”
30 years later, the situation is, essentially, the same except that some
less lethal treatments have been adopted. Whereas before, a child’s liver or
kidneys could have been destroyed within weeks or days by class 6 supertoxic
“chemotherapy”, it can now take months. This is
where the “great improvement in child cancer therapy” came from.
The Autumn 1997 edition of the “Leukaemia Research” News stated “The
intensive therapy given to children .. can result in .. intellectual
impairment .. heart damage, growth
disorders and .. second cancers.”
The orthodox “cancer cure” hoax has two main facets :
misdiagnosis and five year survival passed off as cure.
"If you are a woman who has been diagnosed as
'early breast cancer' ... there is one simple scientific fact that you need to
know ... more than half the time the pathologist is wrong - it is not actually
breast cancer ... What most women have is a tumour which, under a light
microscope, looks like a cancer to a pathologist. Chances are this tumour lacks
the ability to metastasize ... the hallmark of a genuine cancer ... The world's
first controlled trial of adjuvant therapies for breast cancer was centralised
in my department ... Dr Leslie Blumenson and I ... made a surprising discovery.
More than half the patients ... had tumours ... that were more like benign
lesions. Our discovery was highly unpopular with the medical profession.
Doctors could never afford to admit the scientific truth because the standard
treatment in those days was radical mastectomy. Admitting the truth could lead
to malpractice suits by women who had lost a breast because of an incorrect
medical diagnosis, ... The furious doctors at the NCI ... took our highly
successful breast cancer research program away from us ... they eventually
succeeded in suppressing our findings and blocking new publications ... Breast
cancer and prostate cancer are statistical twins. When the functions of these
two sexual organs diminish, the cells often become abnormal and look like
cancer cells ... The Journal of the American Medical Association reported
amazingly high survival rates ... of untreated early prostate cancer, which
showed 7 out of 8 tumours were not cancers. There is no reason for women to
panic when they hear 'cancer' ; panic makes them easy victims." Dr Irwin Bross PhD
The 5-year survival cure is permanent : if a patient dies 6 years after
diagnosis, due to the effects of the treatment, they remain in the “cure”
statistics: cured and dead.
Unfortunately, for the cancer
syndicate, periodically, some high-profile person develops genuine cancer.
King George V1, The Shah of Persia, Senator Hubert
Humphrey, John Wayne, Jackie Onassis, Bobby Moore, Roy Castle, Marti Caine,
Dusty Springfield, Linda McCartney, King Hussein of Jordan, George Harrison,
John Thaw, Alan Bates, Bob Monkhouse, Anne Bancroft …
all chose “life-saving modern
cancer therapy”. All
R.I.P.
The actions of the cancer orthodoxy clearly fit the definition of
malpractice: “ ... improper or injurous medical or surgical
treatment through carelessness, ignorance or intent ..” or worse
“ ... a more
serious criminal lack of care arising
from deliberate disregard for the care and safety of other persons
constitutes manslaughter.”
“Still the money pours in
for 'Cancer Research' from kind-hearted, well-meaning people, in spite of the
fact that the much-advertised 'cures' and 'discoveries' invariably turn out,
year after year, to be no cure at all but rather an aggravation of the trouble,
the proof of this being the steady increase of the disease on all sides... Surely
there should be some result to show as a partial excuse for the torturing of so
many animals ... the public still does not realise that nothing is likely to
happen, no progress ever likely or even possible whilst the research is done on
demonstrably wrong lines ..." Morley
Stainer 1940.
The French cancer specialist, Prof Charles Mathe, declared: "If
I contracted cancer, I would never go to a standard cancer treatment centre.
Cancer victims who live far from such centres have a chance.”
According to Sainsbury, Johnston, Haward. Lancet 1999 353 p1132.:
"Patients who presented early and were treated in less than 30 days had
significantly worse outcomes ... the drive for all women with possible breast
cancer to be seen within 14 days ... is
not supported by this study."
"From a scientific standpoint, ... 'animal model
systems' in cancer research have been a total failure ... animal model systems
not only kill animals they also kill humans. There is no good, factual,
evidence to show that the use of animals in cancer research has led to the
prevention or cure of a single human cancer." Dr Irwin D Bross
PhD.
Animal-based
"cancer research" fund-raisers include - CANCER RESEARCH UK : LEUKAEMIA RESEARCH FUND : TENOVUS : BREAKTHROUGH : YORKSHIRE CANCER RESEARCH CAMPAIGN : CANCER AND LEUKAEMIA IN CHILDHOOD TRUST : INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH : WORLD CANCER
RESEARCH FUND : ACTION CANCER : BREAST
CANCER CAMPAIGN : CANCER TREATMENT & RESEARCH TRUST : CLIC : MARIE CURIE
CANCER CARE : NORTH WEST CANCER RESEARCH FUND :
Animal
experimentation GUARANTEES failure and the everlasting “need for more research".
THE CANCER BUSINESS Pat Rattigan 36-page booklet.
Lethal treatments, fraudulent research,
suppressed cures, protected carcinogens, the orthodox "cure" hoax,
cancer survival. £1.75 pp
The BRITISH ANTIVIVISECTION ASSOCIATION is an infiltration-proof,
voluntary group with no connections to the vivisection industry or its
front-line defence, The Home Office.
All monies donated are used to fight vivisection.
BAVA PO Box 73 CHESTERFIELD S41 0YZ
e
mail hera@nemesisawake.com